Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.

Funding for next-generation E-911 services should be set in light...

Funding for next-generation E-911 services should be set in light of new technologies’ impact, which has changed the system from local to national and even global infrastructure, industry and public safety officials said Wed. at an E-911 Institute panel.…

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

“The public has made the decision that this is important to their communities,” said Sen. Burns (R- Mont.). He asked panelists how to replace the access fee system with other means, such as a tax on localities, to raise money for upgrading the system. “A lot of people don’t know how expensive these systems are to maintain,” he said. Experts couldn’t agree on what would work. “We need to explore a range of issues,” said Greg Rohde, exec. dir. of the E-911 Institute. Congress should mandate an “expanded role” for the federal govt. in enabling better management of advanced E-911 services, said National Emergency Numbering Assn. Pres. David Jones. Agencies overseeing the services should stay abreast of technological change, he said. A hodgepodge of local and state oversight of E-911 services means there’s no centralized coordination, since systems originally ran locally, Jones and others said. Legislation proposed this Congress has focused on ensuring that VoIP providers extend E-911 coverage to their subscribers. A video franchise bill approved last week by the House Commerce Committee has an amendment requiring compliance by VoIP providers. The Senate Commerce Committee okayed a bill sponsored by Burns and Sens. Nelson (D-Fla.) and Clinton (D- N.Y.), but the committee’s telecom bill didn’t include those provisions.