The broadband over power line (BPL) industry welcomed as helpful ...

FEMA is backing away from what they have earlier stated,” Brett Kilbourne, regulatory dir. of the United Power Line Council, told us. He said it seemed from FEMA Undersecy. Michael Brown’s letter to FCC Chmn. Powell that “they are open minded about” BPL and the agency didn’t intend to say, as it did in its original filing with the Commission, that all approaches to BPL would cause interference. Jay Birnbaum, pres. of Current Technologies, said FEMA’s original filing with the FCC did seem to indicate that the agency didn’t have any homegrown data about interference potential and was relying on 3rd-party assessments and studies. “I don’t think that it would be fair to look at the first filing and say they found interference.” Brown’s letter was confirmation that the agency hadn’t done any research on interference potential and was conceding that BPL and emergency communications systems should be able to “peacefully coexist,” he said. Both Kilbourne and Birnbaum said the FEMA filing would make a big difference to the industry in the FCC’s inquiry into the technical aspects of BPL. The Commission is expected to come out with its conclusions in the first quarter. “If the earlier [FEMA] filing made the FCC think twice, then this is a positive development and it should help,” Birnbaum said: “But if the FCC hadn’t given the earlier filing too much weight, then this is a nice clarification.” At the very least, Brown’s letter would make the Commission look at the original FEMA filing in a different light, he said. Some industry sources found it unusual that FEMA had filed comments directly with the FCC instead of going through the NTIA as was the norm for govt. agencies that had spectrum issues.