IDT Winstar and Verizon told FCC they had settled dispute over fo...
IDT Winstar and Verizon told FCC they had settled dispute over former’s acquisition of assets of fixed wireless provider that filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2001. But Verizon said in Jan. 2 filing that its counter-petition for declaratory…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
ruling would remain alive because issues could recur under similar scenarios. IDT Winstar and Bell companies had disagreed in last year over terms of interconnection agreements to which RBOCs must be held for fixed wireless provider that has emerged from Chapter 11. In April, IDT Winstar filed emergency petition for declaratory ruling, raising concerns about “immediate threats” by Verizon and Qwest to deny or delay providing facilities. Winstar contended Communications Act and agency rules mandated that those facilities and services be provided to company. But Bell companies contended federal bankruptcy law required IDT Winstar to assume and cure past debt on contracts assumed by pre-Chapter 11 Winstar. Verizon told Commission its process shouldn’t be used to allow carriers in bankruptcy to avoid requirements of bankruptcy court and that Winstar had period to assume or reject existing services or facilities and to make “appropriate cure” for services assumed from pre-Chapter 11 company. IDT Winstar and Verizon said their notice informing FCC of settlement didn’t affect relief that Winstar sought against other LECs in its original petition.