FCC released 2000 biennial regulatory review Wed. that includes d...
FCC released 2000 biennial regulatory review Wed. that includes details on items that agency accepts for further review that were part of staff report released last fall. On wireless spectrum, review said agency accepted staff recommendation that spectrum caps…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
that limited spectrum entity could hold in single market be considered. CTIA and several wireless carriers have been pressing agency to consider lifting spectrum cap on 45 MHz in all markets except rural areas, where cap is 55 MHz. Agency plans to consider notice of proposed rulemaking in “near future” that will consider “existing competitive conditions and technological developments that could affect the continued need for the cap.” Agency also accepted staff’s recommendation to consider excluding rural ILECs from requirement that independent (non-Bell) ILECs must offer long distance service through separate subsidiary. FCC said it would begin proceeding to seek comment on idea. In addition, it will ask whether it should consider waivers of that requirement for other independent ILECs that showed it created hardship for them. FCC Comr. Furchtgott-Roth said he was “heartened” by more detailed analysis in 2000 Biennial Review issued by agency Wed. Review includes staff report that analyzes regulations on “subpart-by-subpart” basis to determine whether they are needed, action that Furchtgott-Roth has championed in past. That level of detail offers “meaningful opportunity for debate about each section of our rules,” he said. He urged regulated companies to take active role in commenting on process that he said was “opportunity to keep our regulations consistent with marketplace and technological change.”