As FCC continued to wrestle with imposing additional regulatory c...

Chmn. Kennard Thurs., Microsoft called again for “imposition of a meaningful and enforceable condition that facilitates IM interoperability by enabling consumers to communicate with each other regardless of the IM system they use.” Along with brief letter, Microsoft and its allies sent 2-page fact sheet listing 8 consumer groups, 53 companies and associations, 10 senators, 12 House members and 7 publications that are calling for IM interoperability. At minimum, Microsoft argued in separate filing with FCC Tues., “the Commission should obligate AOL to enter into multiple contracts with leading IM providers to allow for interoperability prior to offering any advanced services over the broadband infrastructure of Time Warner’s cable systems.” In earlier filing with Commission, nationwide group of ISPs that had brought class action lawsuit over AOL’s 5.0 and 6.0 software urged agency to force company to modify its offending software feature. They argued that regulatory condition changing that feature, which directs modem calls away from user’s desired ISP to AOL access number, “would do more to introduce competition in Internet access than the instant messaging condition that has been the subject of recent press reports.” Meanwhile, new op-ed piece published by Cato Institute said FTC’s open access conditions on AOL-TW merger would hurt consumers and hamper competition and innovation by dampening incentives for rivals to build competing high-speed data systems. “The entire forced access campaign is an unfortunate example of unelected regulators overstepping their bounds,” wrote Clyde Crews, Cato technology studies dir. “They are exploiting their power over industries to make regulatory ‘law’ that should require an act of Congress. Forced access represents a regrettable new incarnation of industrial policy.”